KIHAWA MWENDWA
There was a valid contract between the parties as evidenced by the respondent's request and promise to reimburse the appellant for travel to attend matrimonial settlement. However, the appellant failed to prove the claimed amount of TZS 1,026,000 as the documentary evidence was inadmissible and not linked to the oral testimony, and the burden of proof was not discharged on the balance of probability.
Source excerpt
- Existence of contract
- Burden of proof
- Documentary evidence
- Compensation for services rendered