Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal, quashed a theft conviction, set aside the sentence and compensation order, and ordered the appellant’s release.
The trial court exceeded its monetary jurisdiction by ordering rectification of vehicle defects valued above TZS 100,000, as the offence was not among those listed in the Minimum Sentences Act schedules; the first appellate court was correct in setting aside the compensation order.
Source excerpt
The conviction could not stand because there was a material variance between the date of offence in the charge sheet and the evidence adduced, and the charge was not amended to reflect the correct date. This variance rendered the charge unproved beyond reasonable doubt, entitling the appellants to acquittal.
Source excerpt
The entire criminal process was a nullity as the facts disclosed a civil dispute, not a criminal offence, and the charge was fatally defective. The proceedings, judgment, sentence, and orders were illegal and set aside.
Source excerpt
High Court criminal appeal over theft conviction, compensation jurisdiction, and identification of a stolen mobile phone; appeal allowed, conviction quashed.
The appellant obtained money by falsely representing ownership of a plot, prosecution evidence was credible, relatives' evidence is admissible, and compensation order was justified; no grounds exist to overturn conviction or orders.
Source excerpt
Prosecution failed to prove malice, damage, and ownership beyond reasonable doubt; conviction and compensation order were based on insufficient and unreliable evidence.
Source excerpt
The trial court acted without jurisdiction and contrary to law by ordering compensation in excess of the amount agreed in the registered plea agreement. Once the plea agreement was registered, the court was functus officio and bound to order compensation only as per the agreement. Any additional compensation order was illegal, null, and void.
Source excerpt
The appellant was not denied the right to be heard as she was afforded multiple opportunities to defend herself but absconded without reasonable cause. The amended charge properly reflected the total loss of TZS 37,573,274/=, and the compensation order of TZS 35,000,000/= did not exceed the proven loss. The proceedings were not rendered a nullity by procedural irregularities, and the evidence, including direct testimony and documentary exhibits, proved the offence beyond reasonable doubt. Civil remedies were not applicable as the matter was criminal in nature, and salary deductions during int…
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal upheld a conviction for unnatural offence, finding the appellant was identified, the child witness evidence was corroborated, and no reversible error was shown.
Explore more
