Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The gravity of the offence, including use of a lethal weapon, permanent injury, and lack of justification, warranted a custodial sentence, but mitigating factors including guilty plea, surrender, cooperation, and time in remand justified reduction to six years imprisonment and compensation to the victim.
Source excerpt
The appellant's plea of guilty was unequivocal, properly taken, and not the result of threat or coercion; therefore, the conviction and sentence are upheld and the appeal is dismissed.
Source excerpt
The appellant's plea of guilty was unequivocal and properly grounded the conviction. However, the trial court failed to adequately consider mitigating factors including the appellant's guilty plea, first offender status, remorse, and the presence of a newborn, which warranted a more lenient sentence. The sentence of four years imprisonment was excessive and is substituted with a one-year conditional discharge and increased compensation to the victim.
Source excerpt
The prosecution proved the offences of rape and unnatural offence beyond reasonable doubt based on the victim's testimony and medical evidence; however, the trial court erred by imposing an omnibus sentence contrary to mandatory statutory provisions. The sentence was revised to specify penalties for each count and compensation to the victim.
Source excerpt
The complainant's evidence was credible, corroborated by other witnesses and medical evidence, and sufficiently established the appellants' guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Minor contradictions did not affect the substance of the case. The cautioned statement of the third appellant was not used against the second appellant. The convictions and sentences were upheld.
Source excerpt
The complainant's evidence was credible, corroborated by other witnesses and medical evidence; minor contradictions did not affect the substance of the case; the roles of each appellant were established beyond reasonable doubt; the convictions and sentences were justified.
Source excerpt
The High Court at Tanga dismissed a rape appeal, upholding conviction, sentence, and compensation after finding the evidence proved the case beyond reasonable doubt.
The conviction was sustained as the evidence of PW3, an eyewitness, was credible and corroborated by medical evidence; the sentence of life imprisonment was mandatory under the law for rape of a girl under ten; omission in voire dire examination did not prejudice the prosecution; compensation to the victim was ordered under revisional powers.
Source excerpt
Court of Appeal upheld a rape conviction involving a three-year-old complainant, but set aside corporal punishment as improper.
Court of Appeal upheld a rape conviction involving a three-year-old complainant, but set aside corporal punishment as an improper addition to the mandatory sentence.
Explore more
