Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The memorandum of appeal is incompetent because the Solicitor General, through the State Attorney, intervened and signed the document without following the required procedure of formal notification and compliance with statutory provisions. This procedural defect goes to the root of the competence of the appeal.
Source excerpt
The High Court struck out a criminal appeal as incompetent because the notice of appeal was filed in Mwanza, while the petition was filed in Geita.
The High Court struck out a land appeal as incompetent because the appellant omitted parties from the original tribunal case, creating a mismatch in party names.
The High Court struck out a land appeal as incompetent because the appellant failed to include all parties from the original tribunal case, breaking the link to the record.
The High Court struck out a criminal appeal because the notice of intention to appeal named the wrong trial court, making the appeal incompetent.
The appeal is incompetent as it was lodged by a deceased person rather than the legal representative or administrator of the estate, contrary to statutory requirements and established case law.
Source excerpt
The appeal is incompetent because the notice of appeal and petition of appeal were filed in different court registries, contrary to mandatory procedural requirements; no valid notice of appeal was filed at the High Court of Geita to support the petition of appeal.
Source excerpt
The appeal was struck out as incompetent due to failure to serve the notice of appeal on the respondent as required by Rule 84(1) and for being lodged out of time without proof of service of the request for proceedings, thus not meeting the requirements for exclusion of time under Rule 90(3).
Source excerpt
Failure to serve the notice of appeal on the respondent within the prescribed period is fatal and renders the appeal incompetent.
Source excerpt
Failure to serve notice of appeal on all persons directly affected by the appeal, as required by Rule 84(1), renders the appeal incompetent and necessitates striking it out.
Source excerpt
Explore more
