STEVEN LEONARD
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal against a rape conviction, quashed the 30-year sentence, and ordered the appellant’s release.
- Rape
- Statutory rape
- Burden of proof
- Proof of age
- Customary marriage
- Consent
Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal against a rape conviction, quashed the 30-year sentence, and ordered the appellant’s release.
The Court of Appeal of Tanzania allowed a rape appeal, quashed the conviction, and set aside the 30-year sentence after finding consent was not proved beyond reasonable doubt.
The High Court allowed a rape appeal, quashed a 30-year sentence, and set aside the conviction after finding the prosecution evidence lacked proof beyond reasonable doubt.
The prosecution proved rape beyond reasonable doubt through circumstantial evidence, medical testimony, and absence of legal requirement for DNA evidence; the appellant's grounds lacked merit.
Source excerpt
The High Court upheld a CMA decision dismissing a labour revision over a mutual separation agreement, finding no proof of fraud, undue influence, or trick.
The Court of Appeal dismissed a murder? No—rape appeal, upholding conviction, sentence, and compensation after finding the complainant credible and the alibi unproven.
The appellant failed to demonstrate good cause or diligence for departure from the scheduling order to issue a third party notice. The trial magistrate properly evaluated the evidence and found no credible proof of respondent's consent to use her image. The award of general damages was justified by the harm suffered, but awarding both punitive and exemplary damages for the same misconduct was improper as they serve the same purpose. The punitive damages award was quashed, but other orders were upheld.
Source excerpt
The High Court allowed an appeal over a land sale dispute, finding the tribunal misdirected itself on disputed evidence and consent to the sale.
The prosecution failed to prove the essential ingredients of rape, specifically penetration and lack of consent, beyond reasonable doubt. Contradictions in evidence and procedural defects rendered the conviction unsafe.
Source excerpt
Plaintiff consented to and signed all documents for loan enhancement and mortgage; Title Deed was held by the bank as per agreement; plaintiff failed to discharge burden of proof; suit dismissed with costs.
Source excerpt
Explore more