CRIMINAL APPEAL 149
The appellant was denied his right to be heard on his defence before judgment was delivered in absentia, contrary to section 226 of the Criminal Procedure Act; this procedural irregularity vitiates the proceedings from the point of absence and requires a retrial of the defence before a new magistrate.
Source excerpt
- Right to be heard
- Trial in absentia
- Procedural fairness
- Conviction in absence
- Defence rights