Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The trial court's judgment was invalid for failing to specify the offence and section of conviction and for omitting findings on the second count, contrary to section 312(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act. This defect rendered the judgment a nullity, requiring the case to be remitted for a proper judgment.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal held that the trial court’s failure to convict before sentencing, and omission on one count, made the judgment a nullity.
The trial court failed to comply with Section 312(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act by not specifying the offences and legal provisions in the conviction, rendering the judgment incomplete. The proper remedy is to remit the case to the trial court for a proper conviction to be entered based on the evidence adduced.
Source excerpt
The High Court held that the trial judgment was a nullity for failing to state points for determination and the offences and sections of law convicted under.
The High Court quashed a criminal conviction and sentence because the trial judgment did not comply with mandatory statutory requirements under section 312 of the Criminal Procedure Act.
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal in part, finding the trial judgment defective because it failed to specify the law under which the appellant was convicted.
The omission to specify the section of law under which the appellant was convicted violates a mandatory requirement and renders the conviction incomplete; section 388 cannot cure this defect.
Source excerpt
The High Court held that the trial court failed to formally enter a conviction before sentencing, making the judgment and sentence a nullity and remitting the file.
Court of Appeal held that failure to formally convict before sentencing was a fatal irregularity. It nullified the High Court judgment and remitted the case.
The High Court quashed a criminal conviction and sentence because the trial court failed to enter a proper conviction before sentencing, rendering the judgment invalid.
Explore more
