asile ally said vs irene redentha emmanuel soka another 2024 tzca 33 8 february 2024
The suit house, acquired during the subsistence of marriage, was matrimonial property regardless of registration or direct financial contribution. Disposition of such property without spousal consent is void under the Law of Marriage Act and Land Act. The appellant, aware of the marital relationship, failed to obtain consent, rendering the sale null and void. Costs were properly awarded to the successful party.
Source excerpt
- Matrimonial property
- Spousal consent
- Void sale
- Division of assets
- Costs of litigation