Esheria Tanzania Case Law
Sign in
Tanzania Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Tanzania Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Search and filter Tanzania case law

Results update automatically as you type.

Tanzania decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law Judgment Patrice Odongo V R

Judgment Patrice Odongo V R

Court
TANZLII

The prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant, as supervisor, stole the specified amounts from the businesses, corroborated by his own admissions and documentary evidence. The variance between the charge and evidence was immaterial and did not prejudice the appellant. The forfeiture order was lawfully made as the properties were proceeds of crime.

Source excerpt

  • Stealing
  • Forfeiture of property
  • Criminal procedure
  • Evidence
  • Variance between charge and evidence
Read case analysis
Criminal law ERICK FRANCISCO

ERICK FRANCISCO

Court
TANZLII

The High Court upheld Erick Francisco’s conviction for stealing a motorcycle, but reduced his five-year sentence to two years for being a first offender.

  • Theft
  • Criminal procedure
  • Evidence
  • Sentencing
  • Criminal-appeal
  • Criminal-procedure
Read case analysis
Criminal law MIRAJI ATHUMANI FINAL

MIRAJI ATHUMANI FINAL

Court
TANZLII

The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant was found in possession of the stolen goods because the purported certificate of seizure was not valid, and the oral evidence of seizure was unsupported, rendering the conviction unsafe.

Source excerpt

  • Possession of suspected stolen property
  • Search and seizure
  • Standard of proof
  • Chain of custody
  • Criminal procedure
Read case analysis
Criminal law CRIMINAL APPEAL NO

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO

Court
TANZLII

The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant was the perpetrator of the rape, as the victim's evidence was contradictory regarding the identity of the perpetrator and the circumstances of disclosure, and there was insufficient corroboration. The contradictions and omissions in the prosecution case created reasonable doubt, warranting acquittal.

Source excerpt

  • Rape
  • Sexual offences
  • Evidence
  • Burden of proof
  • Credibility of witnesses
  • Criminal procedure
Read case analysis
Criminal law REVISION FINAL

REVISION FINAL

Court
TANZLII

The High Court declined to intervene in the pending proceedings of the trial court, holding that the trial court has jurisdiction to determine the legality and propriety of the charge and that there was no irregularity or illegality in the trial court proceedings. The application was premature and not properly filed.

Source excerpt

  • Criminal procedure
  • Publication of false information
  • Cyber crimes
  • Judicial review
  • Powers of revision
Read case analysis
Criminal law CRIMINAL APPEAL NO

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO

Court
TANZLII

The conviction and sentence were quashed because the search was conducted at night without justification or court leave, in violation of section 40 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the only independent witness did not corroborate the law enforcement officers' testimony regarding the discovery of narcotic drugs. These procedural and evidentiary failures created reasonable doubt, requiring acquittal.

Source excerpt

  • Narcotic drugs
  • Criminal procedure
  • Search and seizure
  • Chain of custody
  • Burden of proof
  • Sentencing
Read case analysis
Criminal law criminal decision 2024 12 23 15 42 11

criminal decision 2024 12 23 15 42 11

Court
TANZLII

The plea of guilty was unequivocal, the charge sheet contained sufficient particulars, and the trial court followed proper procedure. The appeal lacked merit and was dismissed.

Source excerpt

  • Plea of guilty
  • Defective charge
  • Unnatural offence
  • Rape
  • Criminal procedure
Read case analysis
Criminal law ELIAS FRANCISCOMINANI

ELIAS FRANCISCOMINANI

Court
TANZLII

The trial court's failure to comply with mandatory procedural requirements under section 231 of the Criminal Procedure Act, including informing the accused of his rights and properly admitting evidence, resulted in a prejudicial and unfair trial, necessitating nullification of proceedings and retrial.

Source excerpt

  • Incest
  • Fair trial
  • Child sexual abuse
  • Criminal procedure
Read case analysis
Criminal law NGALAYO TAYEI 222 Eduted

NGALAYO TAYEI 222 Eduted

Court
TANZLII

The trial was vitiated by failure to amend the charge to reflect the minor's age and lack of social welfare officer attendance; material contradictions existed between the charge and evidence regarding the crops damaged; identification evidence was insufficient and not free from the possibility of mistaken identity; prosecution failed to prove the offence beyond reasonable doubt.

Source excerpt

  • Malicious damage to property
  • Criminal procedure
  • Juvenile justice
  • Evidence
  • Identification
  • Variance between charge and evidence
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Tanzania decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.

Source links and collection timestamps are retained alongside the indexed records.