Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The notice of intention to sue was defective as it was directed to Tanzania Civil Aviation Authority (TCAA) instead of Tanzania Airport Authority (TAA), which is the party to the application. The ambiguity and misdirection render the notice invalid, and thus the application cannot be entertained.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal struck out a criminal appeal as incompetent because the notice of appeal misstated the conviction, contrary to Rule 68(2).
The appeal is fatally defective due to improper entitlement of the notice of intention to appeal, as established by binding precedent.
Source excerpt
The law governing notice of appeal from subordinate courts to the High Court does not require the name of the convicting magistrate; thus, an error in the magistrate's name does not render the notice fatally defective.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal struck out a criminal appeal because the notice of appeal cited the wrong High Court appeal number, making the appeal incompetent.
The Court of Appeal struck out a criminal appeal after finding the notice of appeal defective because it misstated the offence of conviction.
The Court of Appeal struck out a criminal appeal after finding the notice of appeal defective for misstating the offence and failing to comply with Rule 68.
The Court of Appeal struck out a notice of appeal for lateness, failure to seek leave, delayed service, and other procedural defects.
The Court of Appeal struck out a notice of appeal as incurably defective because it cited the wrong rule and wrong decision date in a civil matter.
A notice of appeal that misstates the nature of the conviction renders the appeal incompetent and must be struck out.
Source excerpt
Explore more
