Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The applicant failed to account for 25 days of delay after being medically cleared, which is unreasonable and does not constitute good and sufficient cause for extension of time. The statutory period and period of sickness are excluded, but the unexplained delay after medical clearance is fatal to the application.
Source excerpt
The High Court refused to extend time for a forfeiture application under the Proceeds of Crime Act, finding the applicant had not shown good cause for the long delay.
Applicant failed to account for each day of delay and did not adduce sufficient cause for enlargement of time. Negligence and sloppiness are not sufficient reasons. Waiting for a copy of the order was unnecessary and technical filing issues should have been addressed through proper procedural channels.
Source excerpt
Applicant failed to demonstrate sufficient reasons for delay and did not provide supporting evidence for claims of travel and illness; therefore, extension of time cannot be granted.
Source excerpt
Applicant failed to account for 41 days of delay between withdrawal of previous application and filing present application; no sufficient cause shown for extension of time; application dismissed for lack of merit.
Source excerpt
The applicant failed to demonstrate sufficient cause for the delay, did not account for each day of delay, and did not corroborate his explanation with an affidavit from the prison officer. Contradictions in his statements further undermined his case. The application was therefore dismissed for lack of merit.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal denied an applicant’s request to extend time to seek review, holding that a 116-day delay was unexplained and no good cause was shown.
The applicant failed to demonstrate good cause for the delay, as ignorance of law and fruitless negotiations are not sufficient reasons for extension of time. The delay of 5 years and 6 months was inordinate and unjustified, and the applicant did not account for each day of delay.
Source excerpt
The Mediator has jurisdiction to determine applications for condonation; the applicant failed to prove that documents supporting her reasons for delay were part of the CMA record; and failed to account for the inordinate delay of 604 days. All grounds of revision lack merit and the CMA's decision is upheld.
Source excerpt
The High Court dismissed an application to extend time for seeking to set aside a dismissal order, finding the applicant failed to show sufficient cause for a long delay.
Explore more
