CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 15904 OF 2024 defence evidence not considered
The appeal was allowed because the trial court failed to consider the appellant's uncontradicted evidence of prolonged pre-arraignment detention, which undermined the prosecution's case despite otherwise sufficient evidence. The benefit of doubt was given to the appellant due to this procedural irregularity.
Source excerpt
- Unlawful possession of government trophy
- Unlawful possession of weapons
- Admissibility of evidence
- Valuation certificate
- Inventory form
- Contradiction of evidence