Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Appellant did not raise the issue of necessary party at trial; evidence showed appellant was aware of dishonoured cheques and admitted indebtedness; trial court's decision was based on heavier evidence from respondent.
Source excerpt
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal for kite flying, quashed the conviction, and set aside a five-year sentence after expunging unread documentary exhibits.
Commercial dispute over unpaid loans and post-dated cheques. The High Court found the 1st and 3rd defendants liable, but not the 2nd defendant.
The applicants demonstrated a bona fide triable issue regarding their liability for the dishonoured cheques, as they were not privy to the Credit Sale Agreement and the respondent must prove consideration at trial. Therefore, unconditional leave to appear and defend is warranted.
Source excerpt
The trial judge erred in law by applying both civil and criminal standards of proof and by failing to properly evaluate the evidence and pleadings. The appellant established his case on the required standard, and judgment is entered as prayed.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal allowed a civil appeal over dishonoured cheques, holding the trial judge used the wrong standard of proof and failed to assess the evidence properly.
The trial court erred by applying both civil and criminal standards of proof and by failing to properly evaluate the evidence and pleadings. The appellant established his claim on the balance of probabilities, supported by documentary and oral evidence, and is entitled to judgment as prayed.
Source excerpt
The High Court of Tanzania entered judgment for the plaintiff in a fuel supply debt claim, finding the defendant liable for USD 670,000 after dishonoured cheques.
The High Court held the 1st defendant liable for the unpaid fuel debt based on dishonoured cheques, but dismissed the claim against the 2nd defendant.
A factual dispute as to the existence of a contractual relationship and issuance of cheques constitutes a triable issue. The High Court erred by requiring the appellant to show a defence on merit at the leave stage. Leave to defend should have been granted.
Source excerpt
Explore more
