ELIZABETH NYAGAYA V
The applicant's uncontroverted affidavit established that the 2nd respondent, as director of the 1st respondent, concealed company assets to obstruct execution of the decree, constituting special circumstances justifying lifting the corporate veil and holding him personally liable for the unsatisfied judgment.
Source excerpt
- Lifting corporate veil
- Enforcement of judgment
- Director liability
- Execution of decree
- Unfair termination