Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court at Mwanza allowed a rape conviction appeal, finding the prosecution failed to prove the charge beyond reasonable doubt and set aside the sentence.
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal against an armed robbery conviction, finding the visual identification unreliable and the gun-magazine link unproven.
The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the respondent authored or signed the disputed letter; expert evidence was unsupported by scientific criteria and lacked objectivity; no cogent evidence established the respondent's guilt in either count.
Source excerpt
The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the respondent authored or forged the disputed letter; expert evidence was unsupported by scientific data and lacked objectivity; no cogent evidence established the respondent's guilt.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal partly allowed the appeal, quashing the drunk-driving conviction but upholding the reckless-driving conviction.
The prosecution failed to prove the offence of driving under the influence of alcohol beyond reasonable doubt due to the timing of the test and intervening factors, but proved the offence of causing damage through reckless driving based on cumulative evidence including the sketch map, vehicle inspection report, and appellant's own testimony.
Source excerpt
Conviction cannot be sustained solely on uncorroborated expert evidence and inconsistent witness testimony; prosecution failed to prove charges beyond reasonable doubt.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal quashed Omari Ahmed’s conviction for stealing a motor vehicle, holding that the prosecution evidence was unreliable and insufficient.
The conviction was based solely on the handwriting expert's report, which lacked sufficient detail and supporting evidence. The trial magistrate failed to provide clear reasons for accepting the expert's opinion and did not establish opportunity or direct connection between the appellant and the offences. There was no evidence to support the charge of theft or forgery beyond reasonable doubt.
Source excerpt
Explore more
