The High Court declined to vary bail conditions in a criminal application involving a holding charge pending transfer to Zambia, leaving the original security requirement intact.
The conviction for armed robbery was upheld solely on the basis of the credible and reliable identification evidence of PW8, as the cautioned statements taken by Kenyan police were inadmissible and the evidence regarding properties found with the appellants was insufficient. The defence of alibi did not create reasonable doubt due to the strength of the prosecution's identification evidence. Procedural issues regarding extradition were not considered as they were raised for the first time on appeal.