Sign in
Tanzania Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Tanzania Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Tanzania decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law CRIMINAL APPEAL NO

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO

The conviction was upheld because the evidence of the victim, corroborated by medical and circumstantial evidence, proved the offence of rape beyond reasonable doubt. Failure to call additional witnesses was not fatal as the evidence adduced was credible and sufficient. The appellant's defence was considered and found not to raise reasonable doubt.

  • Rape
  • Evidence
  • Standard of proof
  • Witness credibility
  • Failure to call witness
  • Corroboration
Read case analysis
Criminal law sigfrid venance marandu vs republic 2021 tzhc 7561 29 november 2021

sigfrid venance marandu vs republic 2021 tzhc 7561 29 november 2021

The prosecution failed to prove the charge beyond reasonable doubt due to failure to summon a key eye witness and contradictions in the victim's evidence, warranting acquittal of the appellant.

  • Rape
  • Evidence
  • Standard of proof
  • Child witness
  • Failure to call witness
Read case analysis
Criminal law GISLARY CAPS APOGO VERSUS REPUBLIC

GISLARY CAPS APOGO VERSUS REPUBLIC

The prosecution proved the offence of rape beyond reasonable doubt through the credible and consistent testimony of the victim, corroborated by medical and police evidence. The appellant's failure to cross-examine key witnesses or object to evidence amounted to admission. The absence of the alleged eyewitness did not warrant adverse inference as the witness was not material to the core elements of the offence. No procedural irregularity or reliance on inadmissible evidence was established.

  • Rape
  • Burden of proof
  • Standard of proof
  • Adverse inference
  • Expert evidence
  • Failure to call witness
Read case analysis
Criminal law jamal masitiri chaijaba vs republic 2012 tzca 36 9 july 2012

jamal masitiri chaijaba vs republic 2012 tzca 36 9 july 2012

The Court of Appeal upheld a conviction for armed robbery, finding the appellant was properly recognized, family witnesses were competent, and no fatal gap arose from not calling the village chairman.

  • Armed robbery
  • Identification evidence
  • Credibility of witnesses
  • Family witnesses
  • Failure to call witness
  • Armed-robbery
Read case analysis
Criminal law jamal msitiri chaijaba vs republic 2012 tzca 185 9 july 2012

jamal msitiri chaijaba vs republic 2012 tzca 185 9 july 2012

The appellant was properly recognized by both PW1 and PW2 under adequate lighting and circumstances, family members are competent witnesses, and the absence of the village chairman as a witness did not prejudice the prosecution case as the militiaman's evidence sufficed.

  • Armed robbery
  • Identification evidence
  • Credibility of witnesses
  • Family witnesses
  • Failure to call witness
Read case analysis
Criminal law 20120706 TZCA Tanga

20120706 TZCA Tanga

The Court of Appeal upheld a conviction for armed robbery, finding the appellant was recognized at the scene and that family witnesses were competent.

  • Armed robbery
  • Evidence
  • Identification
  • Credibility of witnesses
  • Failure to call witness
  • Armed-robbery
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Tanzania decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.