HAMISI SAIDI ALLY AND ANOTH Vs
Plaintiffs failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that the disputed plots formed part of the estate of the late Said Ally Sufiani. The 1st defendant, as holder of certificate of title, has the best title to the land. There was insufficient evidence of prior ownership or continuous possession by the plaintiffs' predecessor. The allocation of plots to the 2nd and 3rd defendants was lawful. Plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
Source excerpt
- Title to land
- Burden of proof
- Locus standi
- Allocation of land
- Forest reserve
- Injunction