Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The admitted facts did not establish the elements required under section 258(2)(e) of the Penal Code; therefore, conviction could not be sustained.
Source excerpt
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal after finding the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant intended to commit an offence.
The court found that the circumstances, including the burial of the deceased's clothes, the presence of a rope around the neck, and the appellant's conduct, demonstrated intentional killing and not accidental death, justifying the conviction and sentence.
Source excerpt
The prosecution failed to prove the appellant entered the land with intent to commit an offence or to intimidate, insult, or annoy the lawful owner; the appellant genuinely believed he was the owner, negating the requisite intent for criminal trespass.
Source excerpt
The prosecution failed to prove the appellant entered the land with intent to commit an offence or to intimidate, insult, or annoy the legal owner. The appellant acted under a genuine, albeit mistaken, belief of ownership, negating the requisite intent for criminal trespass.
Source excerpt
The evidence established that the appellant had the requisite malice aforethought and intent to cause grievous harm, and intoxication did not negate his awareness or intent; conviction and sentence are upheld.
Source excerpt
The appellant's entry onto the land was not accompanied by the requisite intent to intimidate, insult, annoy, or commit an offence; the evidence did not establish criminal trespass as defined by law; the conviction, sentence, and compensation order were not supported by the facts or law.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal of Tanzania dismissed a murder appeal, holding that the appellants’ drinking did not negate intent or amount to a valid intoxication defence.
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal, holding the appellant acted under a claim of right and lacked fraudulent intent required for theft.
The High Court quashed a soldier’s theft conviction, finding no evidence beyond reasonable doubt that he intended to steal a vehicle engine.
Explore more
