20131204 TZHC Dar es Salaam
The conviction and sentence of the appellant were quashed because there was no corroborated evidence proving he committed the offences charged, and the trial court erred in convicting him based solely on the uncorroborated evidence of his co-accused.
Source excerpt
- Interfering with property used for providing necessary service
- Fraudulent appropriation of power
- Evidence
- Corroboration