final judgment GODLOVE ELINISARIA Tanzlii
The appeal was dismissed because the grounds raised by the appellant were either not raised at the first appellate stage or lacked merit. The trial and first appellate courts properly considered the evidence regarding child maintenance and division of matrimonial property. The appellant was afforded the right to be heard, and the respondent's contributions to the improvement of the house justified its classification as matrimonial property subject to division.
Source excerpt
- Matrimonial property division
- Child maintenance
- Custody
- Right to be heard
- Introduction of new grounds on appeal