Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
A Tanzanian High Court land case partly enforced an earlier judgment on admission, but dismissed the plaintiff’s remaining compensation and damages claims for lack of proof.
The High Court at Shinyanga entered judgment on admission for Tshs. 12,550,000 after the first defendant admitted owing that amount under a loan agreement.
Leave to depart from scheduling order is granted due to undisputed late service of defense. Judgment on admission is denied because the claims are specific damages requiring proof, and the pleadings are defective due to withdrawal of two plaintiffs and lack of amendment. Both parties are ordered to amend pleadings to reflect current parties and claims.
Source excerpt
Neither defendant's written statement of defence, taken independently, constitutes an admission of liability to the plaintiff's claims; admissions must be clear and unequivocal, and cannot be inferred by combining separate statements from different defendants.
Source excerpt
The Defendant's admission in paragraph 6 of the amended Written Statement of Defence was clear, unequivocal, and unambiguous, entitling the Plaintiff to judgment on admission for the admitted amount of USD 26,204.80.
Source excerpt
The High Court dismissed a civil reference, holding that Order XLI rule 1 does not permit reference of interlocutory rulings already decided by the trial court.
The High Court entered judgment on admission for the plaintiff after the defendant admitted liability for unpaid steel bars and made only partial payment.
The judgment on admission was interlocutory and did not finally determine the rights of the parties; therefore, the application for revision is incompetent and must be struck out.
Source excerpt
The court held that since the notices of appeal filed by both parties related to a different decision (delivered on 28/08/2024) and not the decision of 24/04/2023, the court retained jurisdiction to correct the earlier decision. The use of 'ruling' instead of 'judgment on admission' was a clerical error, and correction was warranted under section 96 CPC and relevant case law.
Source excerpt
The High Court partly allowed an appeal against judgment on admission, setting aside interest awarded on an unadmitted claim and remitting disputed issues for rehearing.
Explore more
