Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court at Mtwara granted leave to appeal on a point of law in a probate matter, finding a serious issue about the same magistrate hearing the case again.
Where a criminal trial is based on a charge sheet that is incurably defective and there is non-compliance with mandatory procedural requirements, the entire proceedings are a nullity and cannot be cured by amendment or retrial at the appellate stage; the only proper course is to nullify the proceedings, set aside the conviction and sentence, and order the release of the accused.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal quashed proceedings after finding a successor magistrate took over a partly heard criminal trial without recording reasons, and ordered a retrial.
The Court of Appeal held that a successor magistrate’s unexplained takeover of a partly heard criminal trial rendered the later proceedings a nullity and ordered a retrial.
Section 214(1) of the CPA was not complied with because the magistrate who took over the trial did not record the reason for the takeover in the proceedings, rendering the subsequent proceedings, judgment, and sentences a nullity.
Source excerpt
The High Court allowed the appeal, upheld the demolition notice, and held that ownership could not be determined in a miscellaneous application under Rule 12(2).
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal after finding the substitute magistrate lacked jurisdiction by failing to comply with section 214 of the Criminal Procedure Act.
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal in part, finding a 15-year sentence for cattle theft manifestly excessive and reducing it to five years.
The conviction was unsafe as the identification evidence of PW1 and PW2 was not credible or sufficiently corroborated, the trial magistrate exceeded sentencing jurisdiction, and procedural errors occurred regarding the right of appeal.
Source excerpt
The trial magistrate's failure to comply with sections 196 and 205 of the Criminal Procedure Code deprived him of jurisdiction, rendering the trial a nullity. Additionally, the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction.
Source excerpt
Explore more
