Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The respondent failed to prove ownership of the property and that the alleged properties were damaged by the appellant beyond reasonable doubt. The trial and appellate courts misdirected themselves on the evidence, and the prosecution failed to establish the offence's elements.
Source excerpt
The appeal lacked merit as the lower courts had jurisdiction, the offence was proved beyond reasonable doubt, and there was no miscarriage of justice or misapprehension of evidence warranting interference by the second appellate court.
Source excerpt
The High Court dismissed a second criminal appeal over malicious damage to property, holding the evidence and jurisdictional objections lacked merit.
The trial was vitiated by failure to amend the charge to reflect the minor's age and lack of social welfare officer attendance; material contradictions existed between the charge and evidence regarding the crops damaged; identification evidence was insufficient and not free from the possibility of mistaken identity; prosecution failed to prove the offence beyond reasonable doubt.
Source excerpt
The appeal was allowed because the criminal trespass charge was premature due to unresolved land ownership, and the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt as no eye witness was called and the evidence was hearsay.
Source excerpt
The High Court upheld a conviction for malicious damage to property but reduced compensation from TZS 3,500,000 to TZS 1,500,000.
The High Court granted an extension of time to appeal, finding the delay was caused by the failure to forward appeal documents, not the applicant’s neglect.
The High Court dismissed a criminal appeal challenging conviction for malicious destruction of property and upheld four-year prison sentences for both appellants.
The High Court dismissed a criminal appeal over alleged malicious damage to property, holding that the respondent acted under a court-ordered auction and eviction, not unlawfully.
The High Court held that witness evidence was enough to establish a prima facie case for malicious damage to property and remitted the matter for trial.
Explore more
