mugeta torokoko vs muraga gachuma another 2010 tzhc 206 27 april 2010
The proceedings in Civil Case No. 13 of 2005 were fundamentally flawed because evidence was led on defamation instead of the pleaded commission claim, and both the trial magistrate and counsel failed in their duty to confine the trial to the real issues. The proceedings are quashed and parties may file afresh.
Source excerpt
- Consolidation of suits
- Misdirection in evidence
- Commission claims