erasto mapunda another vs republic 2016 tzhc 2175 13 mei 2016
The conviction of the 1st appellant was quashed as the evidence was based on suspicion and not sufficient to prove theft beyond reasonable doubt. The conviction of the 2nd appellant was sustained as he was entrusted with the motorcycle and failed to prevent its theft by negligently placing it in an insecure room.
Source excerpt
- Theft
- Neglect to prevent commission of offence
- Standard of proof
- Compensation in criminal cases