Sign in
Tanzania Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Tanzania Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Tanzania decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Contract law CIVIL APPEAL NO

CIVIL APPEAL NO

The agreements between the parties constituted valid loan contracts, not partnership; breach of contract was established, and excuses such as sickness or lack of time limit do not invalidate the contract or excuse non-performance.

  • Breach of contract
  • Loan agreement
  • Partnership
  • Validity of contract
  • Sanctity of contract
Read case analysis
Land law patrick sanga vs baker sons safari company limited another 2023 tzhclandd 16925 26 september 2023

patrick sanga vs baker sons safari company limited another 2023 tzhclandd 16925 26 september 2023

The High Court’s Land Division dismissed a trespass claim over land at Mioka Village, holding the suit was filed outside the three-year limitation period.

  • Trespass to land
  • Limitation of actions
  • Lease agreements
  • Joint venture
  • Partnership
  • Trespass-to-land
Read case analysis
Contract law CIV APP 125 2023 KIMBAU VS HAIDARI Final

CIV APP 125 2023 KIMBAU VS HAIDARI Final

The appellant lacked locus standi as he was not a party to the loan contract but only a guarantor; the actual lender was a third party. The appellant failed to prove on a balance of probabilities that he advanced the claimed loan or that the respondent breached any contract with him. The trial court's findings on partnership were extraneous but did not affect the outcome, as the central issue was breach of contract, which was not established.

  • Locus standi
  • Privity of contract
  • Burden of proof
  • Partnership
  • Breach of contract
Read case analysis
Contract law cOOPERATIVE rural development

cOOPERATIVE rural development

The trial court had jurisdiction as the suit was a normal civil case, not commercial, due to lack of banker-customer relationship with the 2nd respondent. Partnership between respondents was not legally established, and specific damages were not specifically pleaded or proved. The appeal against the 2nd respondent abated due to lack of legal representation. The appellant's grounds regarding jurisdiction, partnership, and damages were upheld in part; the trial court's judgment was set aside.

  • Jurisdiction
  • Partnership
  • Specific damages
  • Interest awards
  • Admissibility of evidence
Read case analysis
Land law national housing corporation vs suka general supplies 2005 tzca 55 16 september 200

national housing corporation vs suka general supplies 2005 tzca 55 16 september 200

The tenancy was with Suka General Supplies as a business entity, not with individual partners. The notice of termination addressed to Sufei was invalid as it was not addressed to the tenant. The Regional Housing Allocation Committee failed to observe natural justice by not addressing the respondent. There was no evidence to support the award of compensation for inconvenience, and thus the award was quashed.

  • Tenancy
  • Termination of lease
  • Partnership
  • Natural justice
  • Compensation for business interference
Read case analysis
Contract 19840608 TZHC Tanga

19840608 TZHC Tanga

The High Court at Tanga dismissed a claim for repair expenses and business-loss damages after finding the plaintiff failed to prove payment, loss, or an employment relationship.

  • Partnership
  • Lease
  • Damages
  • Business interruption
  • Civil-procedure
  • Burden-of-proof
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Tanzania decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.