Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The dispute was resolved by a registered settlement agreement, with leave granted for a separate suit on penalties, and no order for costs as per the parties' agreement.
Source excerpt
The court accepted the parties' lawful compromise and recorded the settlement as a consent judgment, marking the suit as settled with no order as to costs.
Source excerpt
The court found that the deed of settlement was duly signed, mutually consented, and satisfied all legal requirements for a consent judgment under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code. The settlement terms were adopted as the judgment and decree of the court.
Source excerpt
The court adopted the parties' deed of settlement as a consent judgment, binding the parties to its terms and extinguishing further rights or obligations upon full execution.
Source excerpt
The High Court held that the defendant remained liable for statutory social security contributions, but rejected the claim for penalties for lack of proof.
The High Court granted Kiribo Limited leave to appear and defend a summary suit over alleged unpaid social security contributions and penalties.
The deed of settlement, mutually agreed and filed by the parties, satisfies the legal requirements for disposal of the suit by consent judgment, and is adopted as a decree of the court enforceable in case of default.
Source excerpt
The court found the deed of settlement filed by the parties to be lawful and in compliance with the requirements for amicable settlement, and therefore adopted it as a consent judgment, making it a final decree resolving the dispute.
Source excerpt
The High Court entered summary judgment for the plaintiff for unpaid social security contributions and penalties, after the defendant failed to obtain leave to defend.
Criminal appeal over reckless driving. The High Court upheld the conviction but set aside the disqualification penalty because the appellant was not heard on it.
Explore more
