DIDAS MAGESA FINAL 1 PR
The prosecution proved the offence of unnatural offence beyond reasonable doubt through coherent and credible evidence from the victim and supporting witnesses, corroborated by medical examination. The appellant failed to prove impotence, and alleged contradictions in evidence were immaterial. Medical evidence established penetration but not identity; however, the appellant was caught at the scene, confirming identity.
Source excerpt
- Unnatural offence
- Sexual offences
- Evidence
- Burden of proof
- Potency
- Medical examination