Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The trial court correctly denied leave to privately prosecute because civil remedies arising from the contract dispute had not been exhausted, as mandated by section 4(3) of the Criminal Procedure Act. The denial constituted a final order, not interlocutory, and the appeal was dismissed for lack of merit.
Source excerpt
The appeal was dismissed as incompetent for failure to comply with statutory requirements for a petition of appeal. Even if competent, the appellants failed to establish the legal prerequisites for leave to conduct private prosecution, including specifying offences, time, jurisdiction, and DPP inertia or partiality.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal quashed the High Court’s ruling because the appeal there had no notice of appeal and was therefore a nullity for want of jurisdiction.
Circumstantial evidence did not exclude other hypotheses; identification of handset was insufficient; improper reliance on co-accused's evidence; procedural irregularity in charge sheet signing by police officer.
Source excerpt
The High Court struck out a criminal revision application as incompetent because the applicant had not exhausted the remedy of appeal.
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal, quashed the conviction, and set aside a 3.5-year sentence after finding the matter was civil and the prosecution defective.
The appellant, not being the Director of Public Prosecutions, has no locus standi to appeal against the acquittal of the respondents in the Court of Appeal; the appeal is incompetent and must be struck out.
Source excerpt
The appellant, not being the Director of Public Prosecution, has no locus standi to appeal against the acquittal of the respondents; therefore, the appeal is incompetent and must be struck out.
Source excerpt
Criminal proceedings arising from alleged perjury in civil proceedings should be stayed until the civil application is determined to prevent conflicting decisions; leave for private prosecution was properly granted and District Court has jurisdiction.
Source excerpt
The criminal proceedings should be stayed until the related civil application is disposed of, as proceeding with the criminal case before the civil matter is determined could result in conflicting decisions regarding the alleged falsehood.
Source excerpt
Explore more
