MANENO MANYIKA
High Court criminal appeal over statutory rape: conviction upheld, sentence reduced from life imprisonment to 30 years, and cautioned statement expunged.
- Statutory rape
- Evidence
- Sentencing
- Procedure
- Statutory-rape
- Criminal-appeal
Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
High Court criminal appeal over statutory rape: conviction upheld, sentence reduced from life imprisonment to 30 years, and cautioned statement expunged.
The High Court at Kigoma dismissed a criminal appeal against an incest conviction, upholding a 30-year sentence and finding the prosecution proved its case.
The appellant was not properly identified by PW1 as the perpetrator; identification parade was unlawful, no prior description was given, and evidence of identification was unreliable. The prosecution failed to prove the charge beyond reasonable doubt.
Source excerpt
The High Court dismissed a criminal appeal against a conviction for unnatural offence, finding the evidence proved penetration and the sentence was proper.
The Court of Appeal upheld a rape conviction but quashed the conviction for impregnating a schoolgirl, citing lack of proof after excluding improperly received testimony.
The trial court's proceedings and judgment are nullified due to lack of jurisdiction, as the consent and certificate conferring jurisdiction were not formally endorsed and admitted in the trial court's proceedings.
Source excerpt
Existence of a land ownership dispute precludes criminal conviction for trespass and theft; criminal courts lack jurisdiction to resolve ownership; conviction, sentences, and compensation orders quashed.
Source excerpt
The suit was prematurely instituted as the plaintiff failed to serve the Commissioner for Lands with the mandatory 90 days’ statutory notice required by Section 6(2) of the Government Proceedings Act, rendering the suit incompetent.
Source excerpt
The failure to tender and admit the certificate from the Marriage Reconciliation Board as evidence in the trial court rendered the divorce petition incompetent for non-compliance with section 101 of the Law of Marriage Act, depriving the court of jurisdiction. Consequently, all subsequent proceedings and decisions were invalid.
Source excerpt
The trial court erred in law by failing to conduct a mandatory inquiry into the appellant's age after he claimed to be a minor, rendering the proceedings, conviction, and sentence a nullity and necessitating a retrial after proper age determination.
Source excerpt
Explore more