Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Court of Appeal held that disputed grounds raised points of law, not purely facts; it also found omitted documents non-core and allowed rectification of the delay certificate.
The Court of Appeal struck out a revision application because it was brought under the wrong provision and the record lacked essential documents for revision.
The Court of Appeal at Zanzibar struck out a revision application for incompetence because the applicants failed to file a complete lower-court record.
The application was struck out because the applicant failed to supply all required records, rendering the application incomplete and incompetent.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal struck out Bank M’s appeal as incompetent for an incomplete record and a date mismatch between the ruling and drawn order.
The appeal was struck out because the record did not include mandatory rulings delivered during the High Court proceedings, violating Rule 96(1)(g) of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal struck out the appeal as incompetent because the record omitted the decree required by the rules, and awarded costs to the respondent.
Explore more
