Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The CMA proceedings and award were nullified because the applicant was denied the right to be heard, specifically by not being afforded an opportunity to comment on the admission of exhibits, which constituted a breach of natural justice and rendered the proceedings a nullity.
Source excerpt
The High Court partly allowed a second appeal over a car sale dispute, holding the buyer could not keep the car and also recover the advance payment.
The High Court allowed revision, set aside a CMA award, and held that the employer lawfully terminated the contract under its terms and with proper notice.
The respondent breached the lease agreement by vacating the premises before the end of the contractual period without paying the outstanding rent and 50% of service charges as stipulated in the contract. The High Court erred in considering unpleaded matters and in failing to award the contractual remedies. The lease agreement was valid and admissible despite late payment of stamp duty.
Source excerpt
The High Court partly allowed revision, setting aside a 12-month award and substituting one month’s salary after finding an automatic one-month contract extension.
The High Court dismissed a claim that the National Housing Corporation breached a joint venture agreement to redevelop property in Dar es Salaam.
The High Court in Dar es Salaam dismissed a challenge to an arbitral award and ordered it registered and enforced as a judgment of the court.
The applicant failed to prove the respondent absconded from work or that termination was fair; the employer did not follow disciplinary procedures or provide evidence of absence. The Arbitrator correctly awarded the respondent the remaining contract period salary and June 2017 salary as the termination was unfair and in breach of contract.
Source excerpt
The High Court set aside a land tribunal decision and restored the ward tribunal’s ruling, holding that land already given to the appellants could not be resold to the respondent.
The Court held that Angela Amudo was appointed as professional staff under EAC rules, entitled to a five-year contract, and awarded partial damages.
Explore more
