Sign in
Tanzania Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Tanzania Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Tanzania decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Labour law winfred ngitu vs kimani minerals ltd 2023 tzhcld 1330 16 june 2023

winfred ngitu vs kimani minerals ltd 2023 tzhcld 1330 16 june 2023

The termination of the Applicant was substantively fair due to absenteeism without permission, but procedurally unfair as the Applicant was not properly notified of the consequences of nonappearance at the disciplinary hearing and was denied the right to be heard. Compensation is limited to six months' salary due to procedural unfairness only.

  • Unfair termination
  • Procedural fairness
  • Substantive fairness
  • Employee benefits
  • Repatriation allowance
Read case analysis
Labour law mantra tanzania ltd vs joaquim p bonaventure 2022 tzhcld 170 24 march 2022

mantra tanzania ltd vs joaquim p bonaventure 2022 tzhcld 170 24 march 2022

The High Court held the employee’s dismissal was substantively and procedurally unfair, declined reinstatement, and awarded compensation and allowances.

  • Unfair termination
  • Reinstatement
  • Compensation
  • Procedural fairness
  • Substantive fairness
  • Repatriation allowance
Read case analysis
Labour law serengeti breweries ltd vs samuel nyaki 2022 tzhcld 89 18 february 2022

serengeti breweries ltd vs samuel nyaki 2022 tzhcld 89 18 february 2022

The court held that the applicant fulfilled its obligation by paying the respondent the exact amount agreed in the settlement agreement, regardless of the terminology used in the pay slip. The respondent was not entitled to further payment, and the CMA's order for additional payment was set aside. The respondent was also not entitled to repatriation expenses due to his own delay in clearance.

  • Settlement agreement
  • Retrenchment
  • Repatriation allowance
  • Subsistence allowance
  • Contract interpretation
Read case analysis
Labour law aghakhan university vs joyce kinyange 2021 tzhc 5919 30 august 2021

aghakhan university vs joyce kinyange 2021 tzhc 5919 30 august 2021

The applicant failed to provide cogent evidence of operational requirements justifying termination, did not follow mandatory consultation and selection procedures, and did not prove that an alternative job was offered to the respondent. The respondent was entitled to compensation for unfair termination, severance pay recalculated as per statute, and repatriation allowance. The compensation was reduced from 48 months to 24 months' salary due to the court's discretion and consideration of economic circumstances.

  • Unfair termination
  • Retrenchment procedures
  • Severance pay
  • Repatriation allowance
  • Compensation for unfair dismissal
Read case analysis
Labour law CIVIL APPEAL NO 443 OF 2021 UNIVERSITY OF DAR ES SALAAM VS JEROME TESHA

CIVIL APPEAL NO 443 OF 2021 UNIVERSITY OF DAR ES SALAAM VS JEROME TESHA

The respondent's claim for subsistence allowance was not time-barred as it was a continuation of the original dispute, and the employer's failure to pay repatriation allowance upon termination triggered the statutory obligation to pay subsistence allowance for the period between termination and actual repatriation. The absence of procedural letters did not affect the validity of the appeal as all substantive requirements were met.

  • Unfair termination
  • Subsistence allowance
  • Repatriation allowance
  • Time limitation
  • Appeal procedure
Read case analysis
Labour law rosemary geore mwaikambo vs bolllore africa logistic 2020 tzhcld 3796 13 november 2020

rosemary geore mwaikambo vs bolllore africa logistic 2020 tzhcld 3796 13 november 2020

The High Court revised a CMA ruling and ordered payment of 27 months’ subsistence allowance, holding the employee was entitled to it until transportation costs were paid.

  • Subsistence allowance
  • Repatriation allowance
  • Termination benefits
  • Computation of terminal benefits
  • Subsistence-allowance
  • Repatriation-allowance
Read case analysis
Labour law daniel mugittu and another vs lonagro tanzania limited 2020 tzhcld 399 2 october 2020

daniel mugittu and another vs lonagro tanzania limited 2020 tzhcld 399 2 october 2020

The High Court quashed a CMA award in a retrenchment dispute after finding a procedural irregularity when the file was transferred to another arbitrator without reasons.

  • Unfair termination
  • Retrenchment
  • Jurisdiction of cma
  • Procedural irregularity
  • Repatriation allowance
  • Subsistence allowance
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Tanzania decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.