Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court in Mwanza dismissed an interim injunction application over a disputed motor vehicle, finding no prima facie case, irreparable loss, or balance of convenience.
The High Court dismissed ENCOD’s claim over a repossessed vehicle and allowed Stanbic Bank’s counterclaim for the outstanding VAF debt, holding the borrower defaulted under the contract.
The High Court struck out a repossession application under the Financial Leasing Act after finding the 2nd and 3rd respondents were improperly joined.
High Court appeal over a motorcycle sale agreement turned on contract interpretation, weekly payment terms, and whether failure to pay justified repossession.
The trial court had jurisdiction to entertain the repossession application under the Financial Leasing Act despite the arbitration clause, as the agreement and statute expressly provided for repossession in case of default, and the application did not require a main suit. The previous ruling involved different reliefs and was not contradictory.
Source excerpt
High Court civil appeal over an oral motor vehicle sale on credit, repossession after default, and claims for damages. The appeal was dismissed with costs.
No effective decree can be passed in the absence of Bundaa Oil Industries Limited, a necessary party, as per Order XXXII Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code and the Court of Appeal's decision in Abdullatif Mohamed Hamis. The suit must be struck out for non-joinder.
Source excerpt
The High Court found the truck sale was governed by a written contract with a repossession clause. The plaintiff's suit was dismissed and the defendants' counterclaim succeeded.
The High Court held that Cata Mining breached a rental agreement and upheld the defendant’s counterclaim for rental arrears, interest, and repossession of leased equipment.
The court held that the plaintiff proved the outstanding debt, but the 1st defendant was entitled to set off THz 42,000,000 as his contribution to the truck purchase, with interest, due to the bank's failure to provide notice before repossession and sale at an undervalued price. The defendants are jointly and severally liable for the balance after set off.
Source excerpt
Explore more
