Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
High Court appeal over refund of land-sale money dismissed. The court held the claim was for repayment after rescission, not land ownership, and res sub judice did not apply.
The High Court struck out a land suit as constructive res sub judice, finding it overlapped with an earlier pending case over the same plot.
The tribunal erred by entertaining and granting execution before disposing of the application to set aside the ex-parte judgment, constituting an irregularity and injustice warranting intervention by way of revision.
Source excerpt
The application was filed beyond the prescribed limitation period of 21 days and no extension of time was sought; therefore, it must be dismissed with costs.
Source excerpt
The suit is res subjudice to Misc. Commercial Application No. 169 of 2023 as the parties (at least as to the Plaintiff and 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Defendants) and the issues (legality of execution and eviction) are substantially the same, and the earlier application is pending in a competent Court. The objections on lack of jurisdiction and violation of section 38(1) CPC are dismissed as the subject matter is not a jurisdictional bar and the claims for compensation are not questions relating to execution, discharge, or satisfaction of the decree. The proper remedy under section 8 CPC is to stay the…
Source excerpt
The plaint sufficiently discloses the period when the cause of action arose and describes the disputed land, meeting the requirements of Order VII Rules 1(e) and 3. The omission to annex documents is curable and does not warrant striking out the suit. Locus standi and cause of action objections require evidence and are not pure points of law. However, as to the 2nd defendant, the suit is res subjudice due to a pending appeal on the same subject matter between the same parties, and thus cannot be entertained against him.
Source excerpt
The court found that the subject matter and key issues in both suits are substantially the same, involving the same parties and arising from the same tripartite Receivables Purchase Agreement. Therefore, the principle of res subjudice applies, and the current suit must be stayed pending determination of the earlier suit.
Source excerpt
The application is incompetent as it is res subjudice, given the existence of a pending case involving the same parties, subject matter, and reliefs before a competent tribunal. The objection is upheld and the application is struck out.
Source excerpt
The High Court dismissed an ex parte appeal challenging revision proceedings over objection proceedings in a matrimonial property dispute, finding no merit in the grounds raised.
The High Court stayed CMA proceedings pending determination of an appeal, holding that an appeal suspends the lower forum’s jurisdiction and avoids conflicting decisions.
Explore more
