HERMIT INTERNATIONAL COMPANY LIMITED
The dispute was resolved by consent, with the terms of the deed of settlement recorded and a decree entered accordingly.
Source excerpt
- Breach of sale agreement
- Ownership dispute
- Injunction
- Damages
- Rescission
Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The dispute was resolved by consent, with the terms of the deed of settlement recorded and a decree entered accordingly.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal held that the parties had a loan agreement and that fraudulent misrepresentation did not excuse repayment because the appellant did not rescind the contract.
The High Court rescinded a land sale contract after a dispute over ownership and ordered the defendant to refund T.sh. 50 million, with interest, damages, and costs.
Plaintiff was privy to the contract as insurance agent; insurance cover existed despite non-payment of premiums due to established industry practice and contract modality; defendant breached contract by failing to pay premiums; internal decision to advertise tender did not constitute valid rescission.
Source excerpt
The High Court of Tanzania rescinded a share acquisition agreement after finding the defendants breached it by taking over hotel management prematurely. Fraud was not proved.
The High Court of Tanzania held that the share acquisition agreement was rescinded, with refund of USD 1,730,000, interest, and costs ordered.
The High Court held that the buyer breached a land sale agreement by failing to pay the full price and obtain consent in time. The seller’s termination was valid.
The Court of Appeal held that an insurance contract remained in force despite non-disclosure issues, and awarded the insured US$140,000 indemnity.
The appellant breached the contract by failing to deliver trucks as agreed, and the respondent was justified in rescinding the contract due to misrepresentation regarding the trucks' capacity. The respondent is entitled to a refund and general damages, but the quantum of damages is reduced as the original award was inordinately high.
Source excerpt
The High Court dismissed a second appeal over a house sale dispute, holding the agreement was too vague for proper performance and that both parties failed to comply with key terms.
Explore more