DPP VS CHASAMA
The applicant demonstrated on the balance of probabilities that the seized cash and motor vehicle are tainted properties connected to serious offences, and statutory conditions for a restraining order under sections 38(1) and 39(3) of the Proceeds of Crime Act were satisfied.
Source excerpt
- Restraining orders
- Tainted property
- Money laundering
- Unauthorized trading of minerals
- Forfeiture
- Serious offences