DICKSON ISACK KIMARO V
The conviction was quashed because the variance between the charge sheet and prosecution evidence as to the place of commission of the offence was material and went to the root of the case, rendering the charge unproven beyond reasonable doubt.
Source excerpt
- Unnatural offence
- Variance between charge and evidence
- Child witness testimony
- Standard of proof
- Section 127 evidence act
- Section 154 penal code