Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The plea of guilty was equivocal and the prosecution failed to tender a mandatory Government Chemist report, rendering the conviction and sentence unlawful.
Source excerpt
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal after finding the guilty plea was improperly taken because the trial court did not explain each ingredient of the offence.
The appellant's plea was unequivocal as he admitted to the facts, including the age of the victim, which were read and explained to him. The charge sheet and facts established all elements of the offence. The trial court did not err in law in treating the plea as guilty. The appeal lacks merit and is dismissed.
Source excerpt
Failure by the successor magistrate to comply with section 214(1) of the CPA by not recording reasons for taking over the case renders the proceedings, conviction, and sentence a nullity.
Source excerpt
Applicant demonstrated good cause for delay due to reliance on prison authorities and delay in obtaining judgment and proceedings; extension of time granted.
Source excerpt
Applicant demonstrated sufficient cause for delay due to reliance on prison officers; court exercised discretion to grant extension of time.
Source excerpt
The High Court struck out a criminal appeal as incompetent, holding it was functus officio after earlier confirming the sentence in a previous appeal.
The High Court dismissed a criminal appeal, holding that the appellant’s guilty plea was unequivocal and that the conviction and sentence should stand.
The proceedings before the Resident Magistrate with extended jurisdiction were a nullity due to lack of formal transfer and jurisdiction; prosecution evidence was insufficient and procedural defects preclude retrial; convictions and sentences must be quashed and appellants released.
Source excerpt
The discrepancies in prosecution evidence were minor and did not affect the credibility or proof of the offence. The charge was properly read and explained. The appellant's defence was considered and rejected. The prosecution evidence was sufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Source excerpt
Explore more
