Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Court of Appeal held that inadequate summing up to assessors in a murder trial caused prejudice and miscarriage of justice, so it nullified the proceedings and ordered a retrial.
The trial was vitiated by the trial judge's failure to properly address and sum up to assessors on their roles, responsibilities, and vital points of law and evidence, rendering the proceedings null and void. The appropriate remedy is to order a retrial.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal of Tanzania allowed a criminal appeal after finding the High Court judge failed to properly sum up vital legal issues to assessors.
The Court of Appeal held that failure to properly direct assessors on malice aforethought and circumstantial evidence rendered the murder trial a nullity and ordered a retrial.
The trial was fundamentally defective because the trial judge failed to direct assessors on vital points of law and improperly expressed personal views during summing up, thereby influencing the assessors and violating the mandatory requirement for trials to be conducted with the aid of assessors. This rendered the proceedings a nullity and necessitated a retrial.
Source excerpt
The trial was fundamentally defective because the trial judge failed to direct assessors on vital points of law and improperly expressed personal views during summing up, thereby influencing the assessors and violating the mandatory requirement for trials to be conducted with the aid of assessors. This rendered the proceedings a nullity and occasioned a miscarriage of justice.
Source excerpt
The trial was fundamentally faulty due to the judge's improper influence on assessors and failure to direct them on vital points of law, rendering the proceedings a nullity and occasioning a miscarriage of justice.
Source excerpt
The trial was vitiated by procedural irregularities: assessors were improperly allowed to cross-examine witnesses, and the judge failed to adequately sum up the defence of alibi to assessors, with summing up notes missing from the record. These defects contravened principles of fairness and rendered the trial a nullity.
Source excerpt
Improper summing up to assessors and misdirection on vital points, including the appellant's defence, rendered the trial a nullity as the judge was not properly aided by assessors, resulting in a miscarriage of justice.
Source excerpt
Explore more
