Sign in
Tanzania Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Tanzania Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Tanzania decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil procedure m asoud msabaha abdallah vs ally kondo mgaiwe 2024 tzca 101 14 february 2024

m asoud msabaha abdallah vs ally kondo mgaiwe 2024 tzca 101 14 february 2024

The Court of Appeal struck out a notice of appeal after finding the respondent took no essential steps to pursue the appeal within the prescribed time.

  • Striking out notice of appeal
  • Failure to take essential procedural steps
  • Timeliness of appeal
  • Service of documents
  • Civil-procedure
  • Appellate-practice
Read case analysis
Civil procedure thobias paschal mwacha vs access bank tanzania limited and another 2023 tzca 233 9 may 2023

thobias paschal mwacha vs access bank tanzania limited and another 2023 tzca 233 9 may 2023

Respondents did not remain dormant after notification of readiness of proceedings; they timely requested proceedings for appeal, notified Registrar of deficiencies, and made follow-ups; form of request letter is immaterial as long as content meets requirements; application to strike out notice of appeal is without merit.

  • Striking out notice of appeal
  • Failure to take essential steps
  • Timeliness of appeal
  • Exclusion of time for obtaining proceedings
Read case analysis
Civil procedure CIVIL APPLICATION NO

CIVIL APPLICATION NO

The respondent failed to institute the intended appeal within the prescribed time and had no valid excuse, as the certified documents were available before the request was made; thus, the notice of appeal must be struck out for non-compliance with Rule 90(1).

  • Appeals
  • Striking out notice of appeal
  • Compliance with court rules
  • Timeliness of appeal
Read case analysis
Civil procedure shamsi said byarushengo vs abdu hassan bakuza 2022 tzca 470 22 july 2022

shamsi said byarushengo vs abdu hassan bakuza 2022 tzca 470 22 july 2022

The Court of Appeal struck out a notice of appeal for late service and failure to institute the appeal within time, with no proof of serving a request for proceedings.

  • Striking out notice of appeal
  • Failure to take essential steps
  • Timeliness of appeal
  • Service of notice
  • Civil-procedure
  • Appeal-timeliness
Read case analysis
Civil procedure Josephat Ludago vs

Josephat Ludago vs

The appeal is incompetent for failure to attach the decree as required by Order XXXIX Rule 1(1) and (2) of the Civil Procedure Code; the proper remedy is to strike out the appeal.

  • Appeal procedure
  • Preliminary objection
  • Decree requirement
  • Timeliness of appeal
Read case analysis
Land law khadija ally vs hassan mahamud hassan 2020 tzhclandd 2193 11 september 2020

khadija ally vs hassan mahamud hassan 2020 tzhclandd 2193 11 september 2020

The High Court dismissed a land appeal challenging execution of a decree, finding the decree sufficiently identified the property and the tribunal committed no reversible error.

  • Execution of decree
  • Description of suit property
  • Omnibus applications
  • Ex parte decree
  • Overriding objective
  • Timeliness of appeal
Read case analysis
Civil procedure edger maokola majogo vs hajat aidat said kilahama others 2019 tzca 431 22 november 2019

edger maokola majogo vs hajat aidat said kilahama others 2019 tzca 431 22 november 2019

The Court of Appeal struck out a notice of appeal after finding the respondents had not taken essential steps to lodge the appeal in time.

  • Striking out notice of appeal
  • Failure to take essential steps
  • Timeliness of appeal
  • Role of legal representatives
  • Strike-out-notice-of-appeal
  • Failure-to-take-essential-steps
Read case analysis
Civil procedure georgio anagnostou another vs emmanuel marangaikis another 2019 tzca 651 18 june 2019

georgio anagnostou another vs emmanuel marangaikis another 2019 tzca 651 18 june 2019

The reference to the wrong year in the respondents' letter requesting documents was a mere slip and did not invalidate the essential step taken; there was no evidence that the Registrar had supplied the documents or that the respondents failed to follow up within a reasonable time; execution of the decree does not constitute failure to take essential steps under rule 89(2); thus, the application to strike out the notice of appeal lacked merit.

  • Striking out notice of appeal
  • Essential steps in appeal
  • Court of appeal rules
  • Timeliness of appeal
  • Execution of decree
Read case analysis
Civil procedure 20151013 TZCA Arusha

20151013 TZCA Arusha

The respondents failed to serve the notice of appeal within the statutory period and did not serve the letter applying for copy of judgment, thus the notice of appeal must be struck out.

  • Appeal procedure
  • Service of notice
  • Timeliness of appeal
Read case analysis
Criminal law 20130507 TZCA Tabora

20130507 TZCA Tabora

The Court of Appeal held that the appellant’s notice of intention to appeal was filed within time and that the High Court wrongly struck out the appeal.

  • Notice of intention to appeal
  • Timeliness of appeal
  • Striking out of appeal
  • Notice-of-intention-to-appeal
  • Timeliness-of-appeal
  • Striking-out-of-appeal
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Tanzania decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.