Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Plaintiff holds a valid certificate of occupancy and title deed; 1st defendant lacks legal documentation of ownership. No evidence of fraud or unlawful acquisition by plaintiff. Plaintiff is the lawful owner.
Source excerpt
Second appeal in a land ownership dispute. The High Court restored the Ward Tribunal decision, holding the appellant proved title and the appellate tribunal misdirected itself.
There was no legal justification to survey the land and issue a title deed to the appellant while a dispute existed and without full engagement of both parties. The concurrent findings of the lower tribunals that the respondent was the rightful owner and that the appellant's title deed was invalid are upheld. The appeal is dismissed as baseless.
Source excerpt
The High Court dismissed a land appeal, upholding findings that a title deed issued during an unresolved boundary dispute was invalid.
The High Court allowed a land appeal, quashed the tribunal’s decision, and held that the appellant’s registered title made him the lawful owner of the suit land.
The respondent, having purchased the suit land first and obtained approval of disposition from the Commissioner for Lands, had a better title than the appellant. The seller, Juma Said Jongo, had already transferred his interest to the respondent in 2010 and could not pass any valid title to the appellant in 2018. The issuance of the Certificate of Title to the appellant was void as it was based on non-existing rights. The principle of priority and nemo dat quod non habet applied, rendering the appellant's claim meritless.
Source excerpt
The High Court dismissed a land appeal, holding that the respondent was the earlier purchaser and lawful owner of the plot under the priority principle.
The respondent demonstrated a clear chain of ownership supported by documentary evidence and a valid certificate of title, while the appellant failed to provide sufficient proof of inheritance or allocation; procedural and documentary challenges raised by the appellant were either not substantiated or not raised at trial, and the trial tribunal properly evaluated the evidence and reached a correct conclusion.
Source excerpt
The High Court of Tanzania held that the defendant was the lawful owner of Plot No. 17, Block B, Njiro, and dismissed the plaintiff’s claims with costs.
Appellant failed to substantiate legal ownership; documentary evidence did not establish his claim; two title deeds explained as original and replacement, not forgery; no proof of double allocation or Tribunal bias; respondent remains legal owner.
Source excerpt
Explore more
