Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court revised unlawful traffic sentences, reducing one fine to the lawful maximum and increasing another to the statutory minimum.
The High Court dismissed a claim for wrongful arrest, false imprisonment, and malicious prosecution, holding there was reasonable cause and no malice.
The trial court was correct in law to invoke section 38(1) of the Penal Code for offences under the Road Traffic Act, but the convictions based on the respondents' pleas of guilty were not valid as the pleas were equivocal and did not cover all elements of the offences; thus, the convictions and resulting orders must be quashed.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal held that Dodoma District Court lacked jurisdiction to try traffic offences committed in Kongwa District, so the proceedings were a nullity.
The High Court allowed a traffic-offence appeal, holding that two years’ imprisonment was manifestly excessive and that a fine option should have been given.
The fines imposed by the lower court were excessive given the nature of the offences and surrounding circumstances; a fine of 200/- on each count is sufficient.
Source excerpt
The conviction was quashed because the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant was driving carelessly or speeding, and the evidence indicated the deceased's own negligence caused the accident.
Source excerpt
Defects in the charges, including wrong citation of statutory section and multiple counts for the same offence, did not occasion a failure of justice as the particulars were clear and the appellant was not misled; convictions for counts that were mere facets of others or disclosed no offence are quashed, but remaining convictions and sentences are upheld.
Source excerpt
The High Court allowed the appeal, quashed a conviction for causing death through careless parking, and held that the trial court had misdirected itself.
The High Court reduced a reckless driving sentence after holding the magistrate had discretion to go below the statutory minimum for special reasons.
Explore more
