Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The absence of the Chairman's signature after recording each witness's evidence is an incurable irregularity that renders the proceedings, judgment, and decree of the trial tribunal invalid and necessitates a retrial.
Source excerpt
The trial was vitiated by fatal procedural irregularities, including failure to properly record proceedings, failure to administer oaths and promises as required, failure to properly inform the accused of the case to answer, and failure to objectively evaluate the defence evidence. These irregularities rendered the conviction and sentence unsafe, necessitating nullification of proceedings and a retrial.
Source excerpt
The trial court wrongly discharged the accused under section 225(5) of the CPA because the prosecution was not unable to proceed with the hearing; the discharge was therefore invalid and must be quashed and set aside. Proceedings after 13th February 2024, including those dated 30th May 2024 and 4th June 2024, are nullified due to procedural irregularities.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal nullified a murder trial for assessor irregularities, including improper cross-examination by assessors and inadequate summing up on vital legal issues.
The trial was vitiated by the trial judge's failure to properly direct assessors on vital points of law, including the elements of the offence, confessional statements, and the defence of alibi, rendering the proceedings a nullity. The remaining prosecution evidence, after expunging improperly admitted confessional statements, was insufficient to sustain a conviction, particularly due to doubts about the identification of the deceased. A retrial would not serve the interests of justice as it would allow the prosecution to fill evidentiary gaps. The conviction and sentence are quashed and the…
Source excerpt
The trial judge's failure to explain the assessors' roles and to sum up vital points of law, including the chain of custody and elements of the offence, rendered the proceedings from summing up onwards a nullity. The charge sheet variance did not prejudice the appellant. The proper remedy is to nullify the proceedings from the summing up, quash the conviction and sentence, and order a retrial from the summing up stage before the same judge and assessors.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal of Tanzania nullified a murder trial after finding fatal irregularities in assessor selection, participation, and summing up, and ordered a retrial.
The trial was vitiated by the failure to recall assessors after a trial-within-trial before reading a key exhibit (exhibit P2), depriving them of essential evidence and rendering the proceedings null. With exhibit P2 expunged, the remaining circumstantial evidence was insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. A retrial was not appropriate as it would allow the prosecution to fill evidentiary gaps and would not serve the interests of justice.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal set aside a murder conviction after finding irregular assessor selection and summing up, and expunged evidence from unnotified witnesses.
The trial was a nullity due to fatal procedural irregularities in the appointment and direction of assessors. The evidence established a prima facie case warranting a retrial rather than acquittal.
Source excerpt
Explore more
