Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court quashed a conviction for unlawful possession of government trophy after finding defective DPP consent, and declined to order a retrial.
The High Court partly allowed a criminal appeal, quashing a conviction for unlawful possession of a weapon in a wildlife management area but upholding a trophy-possession conviction.
The High Court upheld the conviction for unlawful possession of government trophy but reduced the sentence from 22 years to 20 years for lack of sentencing reasons.
The High Court dismissed a criminal appeal against conviction for unlawful possession of government trophy, holding that documentary evidence and a voluntary confession proved the case.
The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant had control or knowledge of the government trophy, and the variance between the charge and the evidence constituted a serious defect, warranting acquittal.
Source excerpt
Prosecution failed to prove compliance with mandatory procedural requirements for disposal of exhibits and certificate of seizure; lack of evidence that appellants were accorded opportunity to be heard before disposal order; prosecution's case not established beyond reasonable doubt.
Source excerpt
The search and seizure were conducted by a competent officer under the Wildlife Conservation Act, but the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant was in possession of government trophy as the evidence was marred by doubts, inconsistencies, and improper handling of objections to key exhibits.
Source excerpt
The trial court's failure to ensure the consent and certificate from the DPP were properly stamped and endorsed, improper identification and admission of exhibits, recording of evidence in bullet form, and conducting an illegal search at night without a warrant or court order constituted fundamental procedural irregularities that vitiated the entire proceedings and conviction, warranting acquittal without retrial.
Source excerpt
Prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that appellant was arrested within statutory boundaries of Serengeti National Park, failed to establish reliability and admissibility of electronic evidence (GPS map), and expert evidence on trophy identification was insufficiently scientific; trial court's conviction and sentence are unsustainable.
Source excerpt
The appeal was dismissed because the prosecution's evidence, both oral and documentary, was strong, consistent, and unchallenged on material points. The appellant's failure to cross-examine key witnesses amounted to admission of incriminating evidence. The certificate of seizure was validly executed, the chain of custody was properly established, identification and valuation of government trophies were competently done, and the extrajudicial statement was lawfully recorded. The prosecution proved the case beyond reasonable doubt on all counts.
Source excerpt
Explore more
