Esheria United Kingdom Case Law
Sign in
United Kingdom Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

United Kingdom Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Search and filter United Kingdom case law

Results update automatically as you type.

United Kingdom decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Competition law [2026] CAT 35

Mr Justin Gutmann v Apple Inc., Apple Distribution International Limited, and Apple Retail UK Limited

Mr Justin Gutmann v Apple Inc., Apple Distribution International Limited, and Apple Retail UK Limited [2026] CAT 35 (21 April 2026)

The Tribunal certified collective proceedings brought by Mr Justin Gutmann against Apple over alleged anti-competitive iPhone performance throttling and consumer losses.

  • Abuse of dominance
  • Collective proceedings
  • Damages
  • Collective-proceedings
  • Abuse-of-dominance
  • Consumer-protection
Read case analysis
Property law [2025] UKFTT 1430 (GRC)

Home London Ltd v London Borough of Barnet (Re Standards and Licensing)

Home London Ltd v London Borough of Barnet (Re Standards and Licensing) [2025] UKFTT 1430 (GRC) (27 November 2025)

The tribunal held Home London Ltd was a letting agent, treated holding deposits as fees requiring publication, and reduced two £5,000 penalties to £2,500 each.

  • Client money protection
  • Letting agent fees
  • Penalty notices
  • Regulatory compliance
  • Letting-agent-fees
  • Client-money-protection
Read case analysis
Regulatory law [2025] UKFTT 1132 (GRC)

Andrew Cole Estates v Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council

Andrew Cole Estates v Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council [2025] UKFTT 1132 (GRC) (29 September 2025)

The tribunal dismissed Andrew Cole Estates’ appeals and confirmed financial penalties for failing to hold client money protection cover and for website disclosure breaches.

  • Client money protection
  • Letting agency compliance
  • Financial penalties
  • Consumer rights act 2015
  • Client-money-protection
  • Letting-agent-compliance
Read case analysis
Consumer protection [2025] UKFTT 653 (GRC)

Ashmore Estates Ltd v London Borough of Enfield (Re Standards & Licensing)

Ashmore Estates Ltd v London Borough of Enfield (Re Standards & Licensing) [2025] UKFTT 653 (GRC) (10 June 2025)

The tribunal reduced a letting agent’s financial penalty from £1,500 to £1,000 for a Consumer Rights Act website-fee breach, finding the original amount disproportionate.

  • Letting agent fees
  • Financial penalties
  • Procedural fairness
  • Statutory compliance
  • Consumer-protection
  • Letting-agent-fees
Read case analysis
Regulatory law [2025] UKFTT 510 (GRC)

Route Estates Ltd v Enfield Council

Route Estates Ltd v Enfield Council [2025] UKFTT 510 (GRC) (09 May 2025)

The First-tier Tribunal dismissed Route Estates Limited’s appeal against a £3,000 monetary penalty for failing to display fees on Zoopla as required by the Consumer Rights Act 2005.

  • Client money protection
  • Letting agent compliance
  • Monetary penalty notices
  • Website disclosure requirements
  • Fee transparency
  • Consumer-rights-act
Read case analysis
Regulatory law [2025] UKFTT 511 (GRC)

Route Estates Ltd v Enfield Council

Route Estates Ltd v Enfield Council [2025] UKFTT 511 (GRC) (09 May 2025)

The Tribunal dismissed Route Estates Limited’s appeal against a £1,500 penalty for failing to display fees including VAT, finding the council’s decision and amount reasonable.

  • Letting agent regulation
  • Client money protection schemes
  • Display of fees including vat
  • Enforcement of statutory duties
  • Monetary penalty notices
  • Consumer-rights-act
Read case analysis
Professional regulation [2025] UKFTT 487 (GRC)

Peter Michael Estates Ltd v London Borough of Enfield Council (Re Professional Regulation)

Peter Michael Estates Ltd v London Borough of Enfield Council (Re Professional Regulation) [2025] UKFTT 487 (GRC) (30 April 2025)

The First-tier Tribunal allowed this regulatory appeal in part and reduced a property agent’s penalty for failing to publish a client money protection certificate online.

  • Client money protection
  • Financial penalties
  • Letting agency compliance
  • Regulatory enforcement
  • Client-money-protection
  • Letting-agent-compliance
Read case analysis
Regulatory law [2025] UKFTT 279 (GRC)

Harfitt Property Agents v Shropshire Council

Harfitt Property Agents v Shropshire Council [2025] UKFTT 279 (GRC) (04 March 2025)

The Tribunal dismissed a solicitor-led letting agent’s appeal against an £8,400 penalty for failing to join an approved client money protection scheme.

  • Client money protection
  • Letting agency regulation
  • Financial penalties
  • Solicitors regulation
  • Statutory interpretation
  • Client-money-protection
Read case analysis
Regulatory law [2025] UKFTT 118 (GRC)

Mendip Property Management Ltd v Bath & North East Somerset Council

Mendip Property Management Ltd v Bath & North East Somerset Council [2025] UKFTT 118 (GRC) (10 February 2025)

The First-tier Tribunal dismissed Mendip Property Management Ltd’s appeal against a £10,000 penalty for failing to hold client money protection scheme membership.

  • Client money protection
  • Letting agency regulation
  • Financial penalties
  • Client-money-protection
  • Letting-agency-regulation
  • Financial-penalties
Read case analysis
Consumer protection [2025] UKFTT 257 (GRC)

LS88 Ltd v London Borough of Tower Hamlets (Re Professional Regulation)

LS88 Ltd v London Borough of Tower Hamlets (Re Professional Regulation) [2025] UKFTT 257 (GRC) (27 January 2025)

The tribunal dismissed LS88 Ltd’s appeal against two £2,250 financial penalties for failing to publish required letting-agent fees and a client money certificate.

  • Letting agency regulation
  • Financial penalties
  • Statutory compliance
  • Letting-agency-regulation
  • Financial-penalties
  • Consumer-protection
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

United Kingdom decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.

Source links and collection timestamps are retained alongside the indexed records.