Esheria United Kingdom Case Law
Sign in
United Kingdom Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

United Kingdom Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Search and filter United Kingdom case law

Results update automatically as you type.

United Kingdom decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Employment law [2026] EAT 36

Matovu v The Chambers of Mr Martin Porter KC & Ors (Practice and Procedure)

Matovu v The Chambers of Mr Martin Porter KC & Ors (Practice and Procedure) [2026] EAT 36 (05 March 2026)

The Employment Appeal Tribunal allowed an appeal against case management decisions, holding that the judge wrongly refused an amendment and RFI, and that the overall conduct gave rise to apparent bias.

  • Case management
  • Amendment of pleadings
  • Apparent bias
  • Victimisation
  • Race discrimination
  • Requests for further information
Read case analysis
Employment law [2026] EAT 44

Manuel v Netduma Ltd (Practice and Procedure; Amendment)

Manuel v Netduma Ltd (Practice and Procedure; Amendment) [2026] EAT 44 (03 March 2026)

The EAT held that the claimant’s s.44 health and safety detriment claim was already pleaded in the ET1, so no amendment was needed and the refusal to amend was set aside.

  • Amendment of pleadings
  • Protected disclosures
  • Health and safety detriment
  • Employment rights act 1996 s.44
  • Automatic unfair dismissal
  • Employment-law
Read case analysis
Employment law [2024] EAT 194

Douglas v North Lanarkshire Council (Practice and procedure - amendment - time limits - Unfair dismissal - scope of "reasonable inquiry")

Douglas v North Lanarkshire Council (Practice and procedure - amendment - time limits - Unfair dismissal - scope of "reasonable inquiry") [2024] EAT 194 (10 December 2024)

The EAT dismissed an appeal about time bar in a protected-disclosure amendment and upheld the tribunal’s unfair dismissal decision.

  • Unfair dismissal
  • Protected disclosures
  • Amendment of pleadings
  • Time limits
  • Jurisdiction
  • Unfair-dismissal
Read case analysis
Employment law [2024] EAT 137

Treadwell v Barton Turns Development Ltd (Practice and procedure)

Treadwell v Barton Turns Development Ltd (Practice and procedure) [2024] EAT 137 (07 August 2024)

The EAT allowed an amendment to plead whistleblowing detriment in dismissal, holding Osipov bound it, and dismissed the respondent’s cross-appeal.

  • Protected disclosures
  • Whistleblowing
  • Vicarious liability
  • Detriment
  • Dismissal
  • Amendment of pleadings
Read case analysis
Employment law [2024] EAT 170

Vassallo v Mizuho International PLC & Anor

Vassallo v Mizuho International PLC & Anor [2024] EAT 170 (19 June 2024)

The EAT dismissed an appeal against refusal to amend an employment claim, holding the judge was entitled to find whistleblowing and unfair dismissal claims had been deliberately omitted.

  • Amendment of pleadings
  • Whistleblowing
  • Unfair dismissal
  • Indirect associative discrimination
  • Legal representation
  • Balance of injustice
Read case analysis
Employment law [2024] EAT 93

Ayub v Ministry of Defence (RACTICE & PROCEDURE; RACE DISCRIMINATION)

Ayub v Ministry of Defence (RACTICE & PROCEDURE; RACE DISCRIMINATION) [2024] EAT 93 (17 May 2024)

The EAT allowed an appeal against refusal to amend a race discrimination claim, holding the tribunal failed to consider key explanations for delay and context.

  • Race discrimination
  • Practice and procedure
  • Amendment of pleadings
  • Employment-appeal-tribunal
  • Race-discrimination
  • Amendment-of-pleadings
Read case analysis
Employment law [2024] EAT 75

Johnstone & Anor v Glasgow City Council

Johnstone & Anor v Glasgow City Council [2024] EAT 75 (13 May 2024)

The EAT dismissed foster carers’ appeal against refusal of some proposed amendments to their Employment Tribunal claims.

  • Amendment of pleadings
  • Judicial discretion
  • Employment status
  • Unlawful detriment
  • Whistleblowing
  • Health and safety
Read case analysis
Employment law [2024] EAT 70

W v Interserve Group Ltd & Ors (PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE) (Rev1)

W v Interserve Group Ltd & Ors (PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE) (Rev1) [2024] EAT 70 (26 March 2024)

The EAT held that a litigant in person’s particulars sufficiently pleaded reliance on earlier protected disclosures, so amendment was not required.

  • Protected disclosures
  • Whistleblowing
  • Unfair dismissal
  • Detrimental treatment
  • Amendment of pleadings
  • Case management
Read case analysis
Employment law [2024] EAT 1

Sean Pong Tyres Ltd v Moore (TRANSFER OF UNDERTAKINGS - PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE)

Sean Pong Tyres Ltd v Moore (TRANSFER OF UNDERTAKINGS - PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE) [2024] EAT 1 (29 January 2024)

The EAT dismissed Sean Pong Tyres Ltd’s appeal, holding that TUPE did not transfer liability for the claimant’s unfair dismissal and Equality Act claims.

  • Unfair constructive dismissal
  • Harassment
  • Transfer of undertakings (tupe)
  • Amendment of pleadings
  • Vicarious liability
  • Tupe
Read case analysis
Tax law [2023] UKFTT 854

McGeown Transport Ltd v Revenue & Customs (PROCEDURE - respondents' application to strike out appeal - assessment to excise duty after seizure event - original pleadings as 'innocent agent')

McGeown Transport Ltd v Revenue & Customs (PROCEDURE - respondents' application to strike out appeal - assessment to excise duty after seizure event - original pleadings as 'innocent agent') [2023] UKFTT 854 (TC) (27 September 2023)

The tribunal struck out McGeown Transport Ltd’s excise duty appeal and refused a late amendment, holding the original knowledge-based case had no prospect of success.

  • Excise duty liability
  • Strict liability in excise assessments
  • Jurisdiction of tax tribunal
  • Amendment of pleadings
  • Procedural fairness
  • Evidentiary standards
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

United Kingdom decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.

Source links and collection timestamps are retained alongside the indexed records.