Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
United Kingdom decisions
Decisions matching the current search
H Amin v Manchester Airport Group Plc & Anor (PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE) [2026] EAT 63 (19 May 2026)
The EAT dismissed an appeal against strike-out for non-payment of deposit orders, refusing relief from sanctions, postponement, and bias allegations.
Matovu v The Chambers of Mr Martin Porter KC & Ors (Practice and Procedure) [2026] EAT 36 (05 March 2026)
The Employment Appeal Tribunal allowed an appeal against case management decisions, holding that the judge wrongly refused an amendment and RFI, and that the overall conduct gave rise to apparent bias.
Leonard-Elmaz v Ocado Central Services Ltd (Practice and Procedure: Allegations of Apparent Bias - Disability Discrimination - Time Limits and the Just and Equitable Extension of Time) [2026] EAT 41 (15 January 2026)
The EAT dismissed an appeal against rulings on apparent bias, time limits, disability status, and dismissal of the remaining discrimination claim.
UI2024003136 [2025] UKAITUR UI2024003136 (2 May 2025)
The Upper Tribunal dismissed an asylum appeal, holding that questions the judge asked about the appellant’s Germany travel did not create an appearance of bias.
UI2024002379 [2025] UKAITUR UI2024002379 (16 January 2025)
The Upper Tribunal found apparent bias in a First-tier Tribunal judge’s questioning and premature credibility comments, set aside the decision, and remitted the appeal.
UI2024003611 [2025] UKAITUR UI2024003611 (14 January 2025)
The Upper Tribunal set aside the First-tier Tribunal decision after finding material error of law in the treatment of vulnerable witness evidence and medical evidence.
UI2023004332 [2024] UKAITUR UI2023004332 (7 August 2024)
The Upper Tribunal rejected a Home Office challenge alleging bias and procedural unfairness in a family permit appeal, finding insufficient evidence of impropriety.
UI2023004185 [2024] UKAITUR UI2023004185 (2 August 2024)
The Upper Tribunal dismissed the Entry Clearance Officer’s appeal, finding no sufficient evidence of apparent bias or procedural unfairness in the First-tier Tribunal hearing.
The Privy Council held that the Court of Appeal should not have overturned findings that a TT$1.5 million payment was a loan, and rejected the apparent bias challenge.
UI2022005358 [2023] UKAITUR UI2022005358 (6 August 2023)
The Upper Tribunal rejected a claim of apparent bias by the First-tier Tribunal judge and upheld dismissal of the appellant’s immigration appeal.
Explore more
