Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
United Kingdom decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Privy Council held the trial judge misdirected the jury on provocation, but ruled the error caused no substantial miscarriage of justice and remitted the case on fresh evidence of diminished responsibility.
Harkins v Marks & Spencer Plc (Practice and Procedure) [2026] EAT 70 (07 May 2026)
The Employment Appeal Tribunal held that respondents should rarely make submissions at Rule 3(10) hearings, except on narrow knockout points showing an appeal ground is unarguable.
Chowdhury v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care [2026] EAT 69 (30 April 2026)
The EAT allowed an appeal against a Registrar’s refusal to extend time, holding the claimant’s appeal could proceed despite procedural irregularity and late filing.
UI2026000601 & UI2026000602 [2026] UKAITUR UI2026000601 (24 April 2026)
The Upper Tribunal set aside the First-tier Tribunal’s decision for material legal error in a sole-responsibility immigration appeal and remitted the case.
Aramark Limited v Competition and Markets Authority [2026] CAT 36 (23 April 2026)
The Competition Appeal Tribunal dismissed Aramark Limited’s appeal against the Competition and Markets Authority, upholding the market investigation findings and remedies.
UI2025005751 [2026] UKAITUR UI2025005751 (16 April 2026)
The Upper Tribunal dismissed an immigration human rights appeal, finding the appellant’s non-attendance was her own choice and that Article 3 was not a required issue.
UI2024004158 [2026] UKAITUR UI2024004158 (02 April 2026)
The Upper Tribunal remitted an immigration appeal to the First-tier Tribunal for a fresh hearing before a different judge after the appellant did not object.
Premier Care Direct Ltd v Revenue and Customs (PROCEDURE - VAT - HMRC application to strike-out the appeal on the basis that tax neither paid nor deposited and no hardship application made - Appellant application for stay on basis that no hardship application required because HMRC had agreed not to recover tax pending resolution of an Error Correction Notice - Discussion as to meaning and effect of VAT Act 1994 s.84) [2026] UKFTT 473 (TC) (25 March 2026)
The Tribunal held that VAT appeal proceedings could not be entertained without payment, deposit, or a hardship application, but gave the appellant time to comply.
Spreadex Limited v Competition and Markets Authority [2026] CAT 24 (19 March 2026)
The Competition Appeal Tribunal dismissed Spreadex Limited’s appeal against the Competition and Markets Authority, finding the decision lawful and procedurally fair.
Aramark Limited v Competition and Markets Authority [2026] CAT 18 (10 March 2026)
The Competition Appeals Tribunal dismissed Aramark Limited’s appeal against the Competition and Markets Authority, finding no error of law or procedure and making no order as to costs.
Explore more
